Browsing the Uncategorized category...


Shakespeare wrote, “The first thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers.” As we know, that didn’t happen. Four hundred years later, they’re killing us with the smothering pillow of hyper-proceduralism. Now the lawyers are about to smother the war on terror.

This Monday, the same day that Attorney General Eric Holder named a special prosecutor to investigate persons who conducted the CIA’s interrogations in the war on terror, Scotland’s Justice Minister Kenny MacAskill stood before his parliament and gave this defense for releasing convicted Lockerbie bomber Abdel Basset Ali Megrahi:

“It was not based on political, diplomatic or economic considerations. . . . My decision was made following due process, and according to the law of Scotland. I stand by the law and values of Scotland.”

Faced with a similarly fastidious assertion of the law’s triumphal self-regard in “Oliver Twist,” Mr. Bumble replied: “If the law supposed that, the law is a ass—a idiot.” Mr. Bumble added something acutely relevant to what is happening to the war on terror: “The worst I wish the law,” said Mr. Bumble, “is that his eye may be opened by experience—by experience.”

The experience of a world beset by terror eludes the eyes of a Kenny MacAskill, Eric Holder and others in the Obama administration. The rest of us may suffer for it.

In a May speech at the National Archives, President Obama, mirroring Kenny MacAskill’s remarks, said we had to “update our institutions” to deal with terrorism but “do so with an abiding confidence in the rule of law and due process.”

That “update” is upon us. The smothering pillows have arrived.

Attorney General Holder named Connecticut prosecutor John Durham to conduct an investigation into whether interrogations by CIA employees warrant a criminal inquiry. It has been shown repeatedly the past 25 years that an office of independent counsel or special prosecutor nearly always puts in motion an Inspector Javert-like hunt for an indictable defendant.

Mr. Holder’s justification, that his own reading of the “available facts” gave him no choice, is close to a preordained conclusion that Mr. Durham will cite one of these CIA guys for criminal prosecution.
View Full Image
wl0827
David Klein
wl0827
wl0827

The day of Mr. Holder’s announcement, CIA Director Leon Panetta said his agency received “multiple written assurances its methods were lawful.” It’s now clear that even playing by the rules cannot stop erosion by legal challenge.

That day also brought the release of CIA Inspector General John Helgerson’s 2004 report on the agency’s detention and interrogation of terror suspects. Both sides to this argument say the report supports their view of the CIA. No matter. What the release of the Helgerson report mainly does is open the dams on detainee lawsuits.

This litigation nightmare, together with the chilling effect of the special prosecutor’s potential indictments, has as its goal making the price of aggressive interrogation too high under any circumstance, including a one-hour-bomb scenario.

To supervise future interrogations, the administration is creating something called a High Value Detainee Interrogation Group. Interrogation techniques will be limited to those in the Army Field Manual or that are “noncoercive,” which suggests more constrained than a big-city police department. Authority is being moved from the CIA to the FBI.

This means that the class of person who blows up skyscrapers, American embassies or the USS Cole would spend less time under a bare light bulb than a domestic robbery suspect. The Los Angeles Times reported in May that the goal of a proposed administration “global justice initiative” would be to get all terror suspects into a U.S. or foreign court.

Eric Holder cited the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Responsibility as influencing his decision to proceed with a CIA special prosecutor. This is the legal office that is expected to release its long-awaited report on whether former Bush Justice lawyers John Yoo, Jay Bybee and Steven Bradbury should be cited for misconduct for providing the CIA with legal opinions about these interrogations. If, as expected, the OPR cites the lawyers, legal groups will try to disbar them. After that, no lawyer will go near the war on terror.

Individually, some of this may be arguable. In toto, it’s a death sentence for an effective war on terror. It makes what’s left of the war—telephone wiretaps or monitoring money transfers—vulnerable to a steady stream of congressional and legal objection. That lets the Obama administration evade political responsibility by letting others wind down the war on terror.

The message of Scotland’s release and the Holder decision is that the will born in the wake of 9/11 is waning. The war on terror is being downgraded to not much more than tough talk. Al Qaeda, the Taliban and the Iranians, not yet converts to the West’s caricature of its own legal traditions, will take note. In time, they will be back. The second war on terror is in the future.
Write to henninger@wsj.com

Sent from my iPhone
+1(203)243-5450

Write to henninger@wsj.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

The battle for control of River Nile, the world’s longest river, has reached a critical stage with upstream states keen to safeguard use of its resources while two downstream states — Sudan and Egypt — want to continue riding on a lopsided agreement signed with the British colonialists some 80 years ago.

Under a framework agreed in Kinsasha in May, all countries — the others are Kenya, Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, Tanzania and Democratic Republic of Congo — were supposed to use the resources provided there was no significant harm to projects and access in other countries within the river basin.

Egypt and Sudan, however, have scoffed at this arrangement and want virtually all use by other states that would threaten their dependence on the river prohibited.

This would, in a nutshell, rule out all projects that would involve diversion of the river’s flow such as for irrigation, fish farming, and electricity generation in other countries.

The position taken by the two countries is to some extent understandable, given the desert conditions that prevail in most of their territory.

That it is also selfish is apparent in that the two countries want 90 per cent of the river’s waters exclusive to themselves, riding on an agreement whose legitimacy is at the very heart of the dispute.

Objectively, the agreement cannot continue in its present form and something eventually has to give.

This is exactly the concern that Kenyan legislators are raising. To their credit, they are urging for more negotiations and understanding of each party’s interests.

That contrasts sharply with the position of Egypt, which assumed chairmanship of the Nile Basin Council of Ministers last week.

Egypt’s water minister, Mohamed Nasreddin Allam, said the 1929 agreement was not negotiable and that it would not compromise the historic rights granted by that agreement.

This stubborn claim on historic rights, and the wider issue of water security which is key to Egypt’s agriculture production, have made the country come across as a recalcitrant neighbour who will readily trample down on the rights of citizens of East Africa to exploit natural resources that nature has bequeathed them.

A look through the historic rights proves that they are shameless and motivated by greed rather than any real threat on water security.

The 1929 pact signed between Egypt and Great Britain, and the 1959 Egypt, Sudan agreement which acts as a supplement to the previous accord and gives Egypt the right to 55.5 billion cubic meters of Nile water a year.

That out of about 90 billion cubic meters a year in total to which eight countries are entitled.

http://allafrica.com/stories/printable/200908040716.html
Hotels St. Vital Shopping Center

Extended Long Stay Hotels Winnipeg Super 8 Portage Ave St.Vital

Fresh Winnipeg Pickerel Goldeye Fish
Strategic Intelligence

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

No turning back from Obamacare

By Mark Steyn

 

My conservative friends — and even a few media liberals — are agreed: The bloom is off the Obama rose. He’s not the Obamessiah, just another 50 percent president. He tried to do too much too fast, and his numbers are sinking. The Europeanization of health care is dead. Fuhgeddabouddit.


I wouldn’t be so sure. President Barack Obama has no choice but to move fast, in part because the image he presented during the campaign — a post-partisan, post-racial, post-anything-unpleasant-and-controversial pragmatic centrist — was a total crock. He has a vast transformative domestic agenda and, because most of its elements are not terribly popular, he has to accomplish it at speed or he won’t get it done at all.


Health care “reform”? As we’ve seen this past week in the House of Representatives, put not your trust in “Blue Dog Democrats.” And, as we’ll no doubt see in the weeks ahead in the Senate, put not your trust in “moderate Republicans” whose urge to “reach across the aisle” is so reflexive it ought to be covered by the Americans With Disabilities Act.


The president needs to get something passed. Anything. The details don’t matter. Once it’s in place, health care “reform” can be re-reformed endlessly. Indeed, you’ll be surprised how little else we talk about. So, for example, public funding for abortions can be discarded now, and written in — as it surely will be by some judge — down the road. What matters is to ram it through, get it done, pass it now — in whatever form.


If this seems a perverse obsession for a nation with a weak economy, rising unemployment and a war on two fronts, it has a very sound strategic logic behind it. As I wrote in National Review a week or two back, health care is the fastest way to a permanent left-of-center political culture. That’s its attraction for an ambitious president: It redefines the relationship between the citizen and the state in a way that hands all the advantages to statists — to those who believe government has a legitimate right to regulate human affairs in every particular.


That’s not why it’s tanking in the polls, of course. It’s floundering because Obama sold it initially on the basis of “controlling costs,” and then the Congressional Budget Office let the cat out of the bag and pointed out that, au contraire, it would cost $1.6 trillion, and therefore either add to an unsustainable deficit, or require massive tax increases, or (more likely) both.


All of which is true. But to object to the governmentalization of health care on that basis implicitly concedes the argument that, if we could figure out a way to bring the price down, it would be fine and dandy. Right now, there are a lot of wonkish and utilitarian objections to what the Democrats want to do, and they’re gaining traction. In The American Spectator, Brandon Crocker points out that this is exactly the way things went over Hillarycare in 1993: Americans took against the plan on practical grounds but not against the underlying principle. “Since we did not win that philosophical argument in 1993,” Mr. Crocker writes, “we now have to fight the same battle today.” And, if we win on utilitarian grounds today, we’ll have to fight it again in 10 years, five years, maybe less — until something passes, and then everything changes, forever: As the IRA famously taunted Margaret Thatcher, we only have to get lucky once; you have to be lucky every day.


On the price tag: It’s often argued that, as a proportion of GDP, America spends more on health care than countries with government medical systems. But, as a point of fact, “America” doesn’t spend anything on health care: Hundreds of millions of people make hundreds of millions of individual decisions about what they’re going to spend on health care. Whereas up north a handful of bureaucrats determine what Canada will spend on health care — and that’s that: Health care is a government budget item. If Joe Hoser in Moose Jaw wants to increase Canada’s health care spending by $500 drawn from his savings account, he can’t: The law prevents it. Unless, as many Canadians do, he drives south and spends it in a U.S. hospital for treatment he can’t get in a timely manner in his own country.


You can make the “controlling costs” argument about anything: After all, it’s no surprise that millions of free people freely choosing how they spend their own money will spend it in different ways than government bureaucrats would be willing to license on their behalf. America spends more per capita on food than Zimbabwe. America spends more on vacations than North Korea. America spends more on lap-dancing than Saudi Arabia (well, officially). Canada spends more per capita on doughnuts than America, and, given comparative girths, Canucks are clearly not getting as much bang for the buck. Why doesn’t Ottawa introduce a National Doughnut Licensing Agency? You’d still see your general dispenser for simple procedures like a lightly sugared cruller but he’d refer you to a specialist if you needed, say, a maple-frosted custard, and it would only be a six-month wait, at the end of which you’d receive a stale cinnamon roll. Under government regulation, eventually every doughnut would be all hole and no doughnut, and the problem would be solved. Even if the hole costs $1.6 trillion.


How did the health-care debate decay to the point where we think it entirely natural for the central government to fix a collective figure for what 300 million freeborn citizens ought to be spending on something as basic to individual liberty as their own bodies?


That’s the argument that needs to be won. And, if you think I’m being frivolous in positing bureaucratic regulation of doughnuts and vacations, consider that under the all-purpose umbrellas of “health” and “the environment,” governments of supposedly free nations are increasingly comfortable straying into areas of diet and leisure. Last year, a British bill attempted to ban Tony the Tiger, longtime pitchman for Frosties, from children’s TV because of his malign influence on young persons. Why not just ban Frosties? Or permit it by prescription only? Or make kids stand outside on the sidewalk to eat it? It was also proposed — by the Conservative Party, alas — that, in the interests of saving the planet, each citizen should be permitted to fly a certain number of miles a year, after which he would be subject to punitive eco-surtaxes. Isn’t restricting freedom of movement kind of, you know … totalitarian?


Freedom is messy. In free societies, people will fall through the cracks — drink too much, eat too much, buy unaffordable homes, fail to make prudent provision for health care and much else. But the price of being relieved of all those tiresome choices by a benign paternal government is far too high.


Government health care would be wrong even if it “controlled costs.” It’s a liberty issue. I’d rather be free to choose, even if I make the wrong choices.

http://jewishworldreview.com/0809/steyn080309.php3

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

In November 1906 at the first Duma he decreed that in communes without a general repartition since 1992, a householder could claim ownership of all plow lands worked in that year of 1906.  In cases of actual repartition , he could demand land held before 1882 plus land received in , provided that he pay the commune the original redemption price. Thus this and other similar policies encouraged peasants to shift from repartition to hereditary tenure and tenures. 

The law of June 1910 dissolved all communes with no general repartition since 1861.  After one peasant in such a commune applied for an ownership deed , all land in it in essence was now in the category and categories of "private"  and "privately held". 

In repartitional and hereditary communes the head of the household received ownership of the land, a policy that in the end even encouraged or even forced younger males to to the city from the rural areas.  It could be said and summarized that Stolypin’s ultimate consolidation of scattered strips into what could be considered "Western-style farms"

 

Tratfor Strategic Intelligence

Resolution Mediation Services

Adword Wpg

http://mysearchengineoptimizationadvice.info/

                     www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

It can be said that important economic as well as social changes occurred between the time periods of 1906 to 1914.  Industrial growth was lifting Russia out of the backwardness and the "Stolypin"  agrarian reforms were creating a basis for a new class of independent farmers. Overall there were signs and measures that social inequality  was lessening as workers and peasants as well obtained higher incomes , greater mobility and even more rights.

Stolypin agreed with the socialists that a communal peasantry  was potentially revolutionary.  His government’s aim then became to abolish the "mir" ( peasant commune)  , free the peasant from it and foster individual farming. 

Stolypin thus explained to the Duma in 1908 " The government has put its wager not on the drunken and the weak – but rather on the sober and strong – that is on the sturdy individual proprietor".

     Tratfor Strategic Intelligence

                                                                                                                                      KeyLargo Bill Bidding Directory

                                                                                                                                     Blog Bidding Directory

                                                                                                                                   Winnipeg Theme Hotel Large Screen TV

                                                                                                                                    www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

                     What is the perspective on Stalin. It depends on the viewpoint – and as to whether the viewer is from the Russian culture and way of thought.  To Russian’s in the 1960’s America with all of its crisises was downright frightening due to instability and chaos.  To their eyes the time of Stalin was something that they did manage to live through and endure.  A country that was devastated in the“Great Patriotic War”  was transformed into one of the two major superpowers of the globe thretening the main superpower indeed -  the major opponent..

STALIN, MAO, POL POT…AND OTHER REACTIONARIES – Stalin and Mao both were cruel despots. Between the two of them, they accounted for approximately 100 million of the deaths attributed to socialism during the twentieth century. Pol Pot was another matter. … What I do submit to the reader is that this is the basis for the hostility of just about every communist leader to urbanization and that they are the reactionaries. Confirmation of my assertion of the importance of cities in the advance of civilization is that it is …

Neo-Stalinism Part 2: Saint Stalin « Dj Konservo – His government has tried to help by commissioning guidelines and books that present a more balanced picture of Joseph Stalin, described in one approved volume as “the most successful Soviet leader ever.” Later in September 2007, … “The people have forgiven him for the repressions, the collectivization, the elimination of cadres of the Red Army and other inevitable errors and tragedies of those cruel military and revolutionary times. “Stalin has become the true national …

A Spectacular Failure: On Stalin and Stalinism – Another despot in his position may have sought even more power through foreign conquests, but Stalin was more focused on vast schemes of social engineering then with international diplomacy. His general policy towards Germany was to continue …. Apart from the human cost (de-kulakization) and terrible atrocities (Ukrainian famine) committed in the countryside during the Stalin Revolution, the actual success of this excessively cruel policy can be called into question. …

Right Ways. » Blog Archive » Politburo archives shed new light on … – According to Khruchev’s report he was a despot and murderer. It took Khruchev four hours to finish, during which he blamed Stalin for creating a cult of his personality and cruel treatment of his opponents. That was his report, and it signaled the end of terror and … In the Politburo archives, Zhukov found a telegram send by Khruchev, who after becoming a Leader of Ukraine in 1938, asked Politburo to authorize execution or arrest of more than 33 thousand people. …

Jihad Watch: Fitzgerald: Sunnis, Shi’a, Saddam, and Stalin – And the Shi’a, now keenly aware that the the disguisted Sunni despotism called “Iraqi Ba’athism” is now over for good. Those Shi’a know that they have all the cards. They constitute 60-65% of the population. The oil that exists outside of the Kurdish … The Qur’an, the hadith, and the life of Muhammad are full of tales of warfare, of cruel punishments, of implacable refusal to show mercy to enemies, of the need of victors to treat those defeated as completely vanquished. …

                     To a great degree Russia was returned to its former state of glory along with buffer states to shield itself from the outsiders.

                     Its all a matter of perspective if whether Stalin and Stalinism was overall good or bad.

 

Tratfor Strategic Intelligence

                                                                                                                                      KeyLargo Bill Bidding Directory

                                                                                                                                     Blog Bidding Directory

                                                                                                                                   Winnipeg Theme Hotel Large Screen TV

                                                                                                                                    www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

             For almost three decades – from the death of Lenin in 1953 – Joseph Stalin (1879 – 1953) ruled the “Soviet Union”   with an iron hand , often as tyranically as any oriental potentate had ever ruled against his subjects.   Eliminating his former comrade in arms one by one , Stalin turned first against hisTrotskyist  radicals who favoured the immediate support of world wide revolutions , as opposed to Stalin’s own plan to perfect “socialism in one country”, the U.S.S.R.  and then proceed from there.

        Some say that in 2009 current left wingers have idealized as well as romantacized the memory of Stalin in their own eyes as opposed to the real history and course of events.

             Having defeated the left wing opposition and driven Trotsky  into exile in 1928.  Trotsky was assassinated eleven years later , presumably on Stalin’s own orders.  Stalin then turned against the “right wing opportunists and bourgeois nationalists.”  Opposed to radical collectivization and industrialization at the expense of current consumption, these “right wing devinationalists” favored a moregradual introduction of changes at a speed that would not call forth the bitter antagonism of peasants.  The leaders these moderate forces, men like Bukkarin had almost all been active revolutionists during the days of the establishment of the Soviet Union, had fought on Lenin’s side against the White Russians.   Now their time had come.  During the 1930’s the victims would become the Trotskyites.

Neo-Stalinism Part 2: Saint Stalin « Dj Konservo – “We must remember those who suffered, because it is a lesson for all of us — a lesson that many have not learned,” Gorbachev said at a discussion marking the 70th anniversary of the bloodiest year of Stalin’s Great Terror. … have forgiven him for the repressions, the collectivization, the elimination of cadres of the Red Army and other inevitable errors and tragedies of those cruel military and revolutionary times. “Stalin has become the true national leader of Russia. …

ACTION UKRAINE REPORT (Archive): AUR#832 Apr 22 Stalin’s Great … – ruled for centuries by despots and cruel ideologues, yet often a beacon to the world in literature, music, religion and science; usually unfree, yet touched by genius amid unspeakable man-made hardships; the place that produced Ivan the Terrible and Joseph ….. Stalin the individual, his psychology, his growth as a leader.” The British historian Simon Sebag Montefiore was granted access to some of that material for his book “Stalin: The Court of the Red Tsar” (2004) and …

Jihad Watch: Fitzgerald: Sunnis, Shi’a, Saddam, and Stalin – And Saddam Hussein’s trust in fellow-Muslim Iran was akin to the trust shown by his great model, the man he admired most, Joseph Stalin, when Stalin had Molotov sign the pact with Ribbentropp. And though a master of malevolent … And the Shi’a, now keenly aware that the the disguisted Sunni despotism called “Iraqi Ba’athism” is now over for good. Those Shi’a know that they have all the cards. They constitute 60-65% of the population. The oil that exists outside of the …

Dhimmi Watch: Fitzgerald: Uzbekistan and “Islamophobia” – You are one of those Uzbeks, and you are mulling this over, and you wonder – what did our great leader Timur think of this one? You look, and you find – while he didn’t invoke Jihad as a pretext for his wars against the Persians, … Does a “proud Georgian” simply have to regard Stalin as his “hero”? We are free to pick and choose, and if Timur Leng won’t do — think of those mountains of skulls he specialized in, think of what he did to the Assyrian Christians who in …

Topless Robot – The 7 Supervillians Who Should Rule the World – There’s no doubt that Lex could be a great world leader–the question is would he choose to be? If not for the way he handled his failed presidency, Lex might rightfully land higher on this list. 3) Magneto magneto.jpg. Erik Lensherr doesn’ t want to rule the world so much as to control his part of it; but still, his basic humanity may save him from being the mutant despot that so many people fear he would be. Had Magneto the power to back up his dictates (and suppress his …

Thought Leader » Khadija Sharife » False prophets and ‘message … – Owen you poor deluded soul – what you fail to realize is that America IS the alternative – they have been at war ever since their so called “liberation” from their “Cruel oppressive and despotic” overlords the British. … Maybe unknowingly , she has pointed out a great sin by South Africans. We want to be so much American, that we even start thinking and acting like them. Problem is, we do not imitate the good, but much more of what is wrong with America. …

Limo Rental Limousine Service Chicago

Inexpensive Engagement Rings

www.2241glasses.com

www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

If the initiative came from the USSR , it met a favourable response in the West and Washington. By 1954 substantive east-west negotiations had begun again , covering Germany , Austria , Korea and Indo-China (Vietnam). In one case , Austria a complete solution was found by declaring the country "neutral" , in return for a full complete evacuation of Soviet military troops and forces. In two others , Korea and Indo-China , military hostilities ended and partition of the two disputed countries , Korea and Vietnam, was accepted by both sides , in practice if not in theory. No solution was found in Germany and some initial willingness on the part of the Soviet Union was rebuffed in the west : but the very easing of east- west tension overall did enable a lowering of conflict in this central European theatre as well. It was not thought that east-west hostilities had ended , and the unfinished agenda of the first round of the Cold War was later activated and played with delayed force- most remarkably in the Indo-Chinese / Vietnamese conflict. The easing of confrontation meant that , while East-West confontation and contestation contunued the first segment of the Cold War ended and came to an end. Tratfor

Limo Rental Limousine Service Chicago

Inexpensive Engagement Rings

 

Strategic Intelligence www.tratfor.com PageRank Checking Icon Display Pagerank

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

2 comments   Comments

 

While US scientists put forward the new doctrine of the Minimum Nuclear Deterrence (targeting missiles against Russia’s 12 key enterprises), Bigness.ru decided to draw a map of a limited strike that could paralyze the US economy. It turns out that the United States is much more vulnerable than Russia at this point. An attack against only five targets in the USA will throw the US economy back into the Stone Age.

Russia’s nuclear attack on U.S. may start with major banks
Russia’s nuclear attack on U.S. may start with major banks

BREAKING NEWS

Osama bin Laden is not dead

Train carrying deadly virus arrives in Moscow

Relations between Russia and USA get into Cold War spirit again

Pilot lands plane on school playground
More…

US scientists put forward an idea to focus targets on 12 key objects of the Russian economy: enterprises of Gazprom, Rosneft, Rusal, Nornikel, Surgutneftegaz, Evraz and Severstal. The suggestion became an absolutely new approach to the deterrence doctrine. The USA currently has the Mutual Assured Demolition Doctrine, which stipulates an attack of some 200 targets on Russia’s territory.

According to various estimates, Russia’s doctrine stipulates attacks against about 100 targets on the territory of the United States. The destruction of those targets will cause critical damage to the USA.

There is no need to destroy the whole planet in order to paralyze a country and push it back into the Stone Age. The IMF can serve a very good example at this point: the organization pushed several countries into the economic abyss without the use of military force.

Leonid Ivashov, the vice president of the Academy for Geopolitical Sciences, believes that Russia would first need to attack USA’s largest banks. A successful attack would paralyze the entire dollar-dependent economy. “This is the number one goal in case of war. We would need to destroy large banks in London as well,” the Colonel-General said.

Inga Foksha, an analyst with IK Aton, did not hesitate to name five targets, the destruction of which would jeopardize the USA’s existence.

The first strike should be made against the offices of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in Washington, Dallas and Chicago. “This company handles depositors’ funds. If it disappears, and if banks have no guarantees, the people will panic and will rush to cash their deposits,” Foksha s

Source http://bigness.ru/

Nuclear Issues: Russian analysts claim any nuclear attack on U.S … – While US scientists put forward the new doctrine of the Minimum Nuclear Deterrence (targeting missiles against Russia’s 12 key enterprises), Bigness.ru decided to draw a map of a limited strike that could paralyze the US economy. …

Russian Reactions to Minimal Deterrence Study » FAS Strategic … – If you have followed Russian news media recently, you might have gotten the impression that FAS and NRDC are in charge of U.S. nuclear strike planning and are recommending increasing nuclear targeting of Russia. …

IntelliBriefs: Pentagon’s new concept: what will Russia respond with? – The United States is building its new concept on a substantial reduction of its own and Russia’s nuclear potentials. Considering the development of its missile defense and a major conventional superiority, the United States stands to gain … Third, this is a limitation on the development of missile defense systems, which rules out protection against a massive MIRVed ICBM ballistic strike. At the same time, restrictions should allow the development of defense systems, …

Russia continues to eliminate old systems – Blog – Russian … – In my opinion Parity is still attainable if Russia continue to maintain a sizeable nuclear strike force. And with the current situation today (with Russia having lost some strategic foothold in eastern Europe and an aggressively …

Russia and the Prompt Global Strike – Blog – Russian strategic … – The “nuclear war thing” does not concern me, because Russia does not have a choice. It will have to live with Global Strike. The GS concept is very relevant today, as I agree with Mr. Wolfson in regarding war with Iran as certain. …

Russia not afraid of our nukes, Barack want us to not build … – In particular, nuclear weapons states like China and Russia are primarily concerned about growing American conventional, precision-guided, long-range capability, [or] Prompt Global Strike systems.” Russian defense leaders have expressed …

RT News: Nuclear deterrent needs reform – Nuclear deterrent needs reform. US nuclear experts have released a report on how the United States may reduce its arsenal to 500 warheads, while retargeting new strategic sites across Russia. The 64-page report, entitled “From … Nuclear forces are still on high alert prepared for a strike in a matter of minutes following an order. Today, American military maintain some 2700 warheads operationally deployed with 900 on high alert, and 2500 more are kept in reserve. …

kenthink: Russia and U.S. strike nuclear deal. – Unfortunately, Bush has a ways to go yet! Russia and US strike nuclear deal. Russia and the US have signed a key agreement on civilian nuclear power that formally allows nuclear trade between US and Russian companies. …

Life after START – Blog – Russian strategic nuclear forces – This will prevent the first strike. I think this is the rationality behind such a move. Furthermore, Russia must consider also another nuclear powers, no just USA (all-azimuth planning). American and Russian stockpiles are dropping and …

World Politics Review Blog |No Nukes – One of the things we often ignore about our own nuclear deterrent is that the only thing it really deters is a massive Russian nuclear strike. No other non-ally has the offensive nuclear capacity to eliminate our conventional weapons …

 

Winnipeg Downtown Theme Rooms

 

Import Car Canada

Tratfor

Links

www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

 

          Party members can be said to enjoy the rights , privleges and rights to discuss openly and question party policies as well as practical acitivies at  Party meetings and in the Party press , and to introduce motions openly to express and uphold on opinion until the organization has adopted a decision.  The pertinent new words were "feelely"  and "openly".  It should be more than noted however that the last phrase was the very phrase and example that the Party called "democratic centralism"  .

         Extending the right of every card carrying member the new statutes also worked to make it somewhat safer for the average party member – be they Ivan or Boris – to do so.  Punishments for willful suppression had been remarkably increased to include expulsion from the Party itself.  The theory was therefore that bosses at each level were more accountable to the ordinary rank and file Party members.  The old statues had allowed Party members to " address , question statements or proposals made by Party leaders and hierarchy at every level."

            Now that had been streched to include specific rights and privleges to demand answers at each point and substance of any address or proposal.

 

Winnipeg South Economy Budget  Hotel

Winnipeg Used Toyota Camry Finance
Strategic Intelligence

www.tratfor.com

 


Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

The Horn of Africa and the Red Sea , regarded by the Islamic as "theirs"  and "their " region and regions are more than likely to witness increased activity in the coming years as Islamists seek in their minds to counter external influences. The catalyst for the more than five fold Islamic strategy is 1) the effective  effort on the part of the Islamic jihad and da’was tides in the African Horn 2) The education of the Muslim populations and their awareness of the extent of the conspiracy  and plotting and planning of the Christians  both in the region directly and internationally 3)  The possibility of establishing a Somali government capable of maintaining a political balance 4 ) The alertness of some of the Arabic countries  to the danger and dangers of a "Jewish "  or "Zionist entity " presence  in the region -  this will help to review their position  with providing support to the people of the region 5) The efforts of the "Palestinian Jihad" will also Insha’Allah plays an external role in upsetting the security of the  Jewish government as well as to restrain , confine and limit its external influence

 

 

Polo Park Portage Avenue Super eight   Winnipeg Extended Stay Hotels

Strategic Intelligence

Resolution Mediation Services

www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

1 comment   Comments

 

Beghal’s suspected bomb maker was his former flatmate Damoudi , a second generation North African of French citizenship. Daoudi , who escaped the French police, was arrested in Leicester and promptly deported to France at the end of September 2001. A graduate of Al Qaeda’s Afghan training camps, he is thought to have the group’s European encryption specialist for internet communications and the use of codes and ciphers. Nizar Trabeseli , a former footballer , is suspected of being Beghal’s suicide bomber. A member of Takfir Wal Hijra, he had trained in Afghanistan and apparently believed that a "matyrdom" operation wold cleanse his past sins

 


Winnipeg Used Toyota Camry

Winnipeg Used Volkswagen Passat

Resolution Mediation Services 

Strategic Intelligence 

www.tratfor.com

Winnipeg Used Toyota Camry Where Can I Buy License Frames in Winnipeg Winnipeg Auto Financing

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

The geopolitical descriptive term “Cold War” originated from the 14th century writer Don Juan Manuel and initially referred to the conflict between Christians and Muslims . It was noted that at that 14th century time period that the distinction between hot and cold wars was that attributes was the manner in which the conflict and confrontation ends. “War that is very strong and very hot ends either with death or peace…. wheras cold war neither brings peace or honour to the one that makes it .” Thus Don Juan Manuel’s observation of warring conflicts as well as political , geopolitical , religious or ethical conflicts applies in a specifc general geopolitical analytical manner to the Cold War of the 20th and 21’st century nuclear era and ages. Tratfor Strategic Intelligence \www.tratfor.com

 

Limo Rental Limousine Service Chicago

Inexpensive Engagement Rings

Argghhh! The Home Of Two Of Jonah’s Military Guys.. – Or, it’s 1968, Czechloslovakia is about to go behind the Iron Curtain. Same as before, do we go or not, and if we don’t go is it because we’re worried about causing a major war? If the reasons for opposing the Soviet Union militarily were that it was ….. all the painful and degrading buffoonery, and, worst of all, perhaps, the feeling of displayed cowardice–all this settles and accumulates somewhere on the bottom of our social consciousness, quietly fermenting.” …

europe at the crossroads – it would be plainly too much to ask the western powers to come to the aid of millions of slaves behind the iron curtain out of sheer generosity or humanitarian sentiment. however, by meditating on the sinister imbecillity displayed by …

the life of mao zedong [book review] – he still held to the ideals, discussed in a previous chapter, about how the red army should act, yet realized “iron discipline” was needed. he saw communism as a “moral force” not just a way to attain power. there was a contradiction …

1968 Year of Revolution – East and west of the iron curtain, establishments are being challenged and new forces from below with little care for the concept of parliamentary democracy as we know it. They are in revolt against a parliamentary democracy which was an ideal in …. It is true that the loosening of the reins of the Stalinists led to huge political ferment, in which the ideas of workers’ democracy, many of Trotsky’s ideas, for a free press, democratic control and management of industry, …

www.tratfor.com

 

Cold War Images

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

 

All too little attention has been paid to President Barack Obama’s shocking plan to force private insurance companies to pay for the treatment of military veterans who have suffered service-connected disabilities and injuries.

 

For most of the media—and, consequently, the public—the plan briefly flashed like heat lightning in the summer sky and soundlessly disappeared. But the very existence of the plan, and the story of how it bit the dust, raises serious questions about the Obama administration’s political wisdom, its ability to govern and whether House Speaker Nancy Pelosi is running things.

 

The astonishing proposal raised an uproar among veterans’ groups who feared that Purple Heart veterans could end up holding the bag after taking a bullet for their country. Also astonishing was the way Pelosi squashed the plan, literally overruling the president only hours after Obama affirmed his commitment to it.

 

Further, the plan’s sudden appearance and its even quicker demise casts doubts on major media competence or fairness. As news stories go, its importance at least equals, if not exceeds, last year’s Pulitzer Prize-winning revelations about deplorable conditions for wounded veterans at Walter Reed Army Medical Center. Certainly, if former President George W. Bush had hatched the idea, it would have been splashed all over the front page of the Washington Post and NBC news anchor Brian Williams would have declared it “alarming.”

 

The plan had been quietly simmering within the Obama administration without much, if any, media notice. Consequently, little is known about the plan’s details, other than responsibility for paying for combat or service-related disabilities and injuries would be shifted away from the Veterans Administration, where it has forever resided, to private insurers.

 

When veterans groups got wind of it, they—not the media—brought it to the public’s attention. In testimony the week of March 8, House and Senate veterans affairs committee and the House Budget Committee, the groups denounced it. Among their objections: The government, not private insurance companies, sends members of the armed forces into harm’s way; maximum insurance coverage limits could be reached through treatment of just service-related problems, leaving the rest of the family without coverage, and businesses might become reluctant to hire veterans. Still, the story did not raise much media interest.

 

On Monday, March 16, leaders of 11 prominent veterans organizations met personally with Obama in the White House to try to dissuade him from proceeding. He was unmoved. Said a statement from the group issued on PRNewswire immediately after the meeting: “It became apparent during our discussion today that the President intends to move forward with this unreasonable plan. He says he is looking to generate $540-million by this method, but refused to hear arguments about the moral and government-avowed obligations that would be compromised by it.”

 

Frustrated, the leaders marched to the other end of Pennsylvania Ave. to meet with Speaker Pelosi. Mere hours later, Pelosi—not the White House—announced that the Obama administration was killing the plan. Said she, quite disingenuously, “President Obama listened to the genuine concerns expressed by the veteran service organizations regarding the option of billing service-connected injuries to veterans’ insurance companies. Based on the respect President Obama has for veterans and the principle concerns of our veteran leaders, the president made the decision that combat wounds should not be billed through their insurance policies.” Requiscat in Pace

 

I would have loved to have heard the heated phone exchanges between Pelosi’s office and the president or his staff. Undoubtedly, she told them that any such plan would be dead upon arrival in the House, and that they were boneheads for even raising it.

 

Clearly, Obama stumbled politically by taking on one of the country’s most powerful lobbies. He also should have been shamed by Pelosi’s veto of an executive branch study before it even gets off the ground. A bigger issue now is: Has this episode set the stage for the Obama administration ceding executive powers to the legislative branch, or more precisely, Pelosi and Reid, and what are the traditional balance-of-powers consequences? Has the election of the inexperienced Obama signaled to congressional leaders that now is the time to reclaim the powers they believe President George W. Bush had usurped?

 

More important are the substantive implications: Who knows, maybe Obama’s idea has significant merit. Aside from the fact that it sounds like something that Bush might have proposed (quasi privatization of veterans benefits), it is worth a debate over whether the private sector can provide better service than the often-criticized VA. A $540-million savings should not be sniffed at, and that, in itself, is reason enough for a public debate. Is there another way to save that much money, without degrading veterans’ rights and benefits?

 

The way the issue was handled, however, has closed the debate, certainly for now and possibly years to come. Blame Pelosi for that; she gave cover to a powerful special interest (of which, as a veteran, I am a part) to control public policy-making. Not many politicians have the courage to remind organized veterans that they are receiving public monies; it is not theirs alone. Citizens and taxpayers have a right to participate in those decisions.

 

For Obama’s part, this fiasco is symptomatic of an administration hell-bent to change the world in a flash, with a blizzard of unfocused, unsharpened plans. Obama has been rushing impetuously, if not rashly, into major policy decisions that impact every phase of American life. For Obama, this speed is a virtue, allowing him to ignore the more lasting consequences, such as increasing the public debt to $11 trillion (excluding social security and Medicare) in record time. If Obama had not been so headstrong, perhaps the veterans’ issue could have been properly and publicly debated, on its merits. Thanks to Obama’s recklessness, it won’t.

 

http://politicalmavens.com/index.php/2009/03/26/obama-prepares/

Obama Veterans Health Care Plan » Blue Star Chronicles – 4 Responses to “Obama Veterans Health Care Plan”. 1. George Says: March 18th, 2009 at 1:45 pm. Great. So now Barry in Charge is going to screw up the military and the VA. What a joke this guy is. He and his followers have no idea how to …

One Big Awful Mistake America (OBAMA): Veterans Will Now Lead The … – The Obama administration dropped a proposal to require some disabled veterans to pay for medical treatments through their private insurance companies, heeding a chorus of outrage from veterans groups and Capitol Hill lawmakers who said …

Obama Taps Mabus for Navy Secretary : Veterans Today – News for … – US Military Veterans News – Benefits – Jobs – VA Home Loans – Forums – GI Bill Education and more.

Mersman Political Blog: Obama Veterans Health Plan Proposal: Jon … – President Obama is right of course to try and save the government money where he can however it should not come at the expense of those that serve our country. Veterans relying on their private insurance may not always be an adequate …

Wise as an Owl… and Bush: My MWP Report Card for Obama … – The Obama administration recently revealed a plan to require private insurance carriers to reimburse the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) in such cases. “It became apparent during our discussion today that the President intends to …

Obama: Veterans To Pay For Service Related Injuries? | The Blogshevik – According to news reports, Obama and his administration have proposed legislation that would force veterans to pay for service related medical treatment.

The Pool Bar: Obama’s veterans’ health care plan: Retaliation? – Obama’s veterans’ health care plan: Retaliation? Just spitballing here…is it possible that Barack Obama’s immoral scheme to make service members carry medical insurance to pay for injuries suffered in combat is retribution for the …

CNN Political Ticker: All politics, all the time Blog Archive … – Leaders of the country’s most prominent veterans groups met Monday at the White House with Obama, Veterans Affairs Secretary Eric Shinseki, White House Chief of Staff Rahm Emanuel and Steven Kosiak, the director in charge of defense …

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

0 comments   Comments

 

The NIF supported nearly a dozen Eritrean Islamist and other opposition forces beginning in the 1990’s including the Eitrean Islamist Jihad Movement , Eitrean Liberation Front.  Eitrea Kunma Movement and the Red Sea Democratic Movement.  In retaliation ,  Asmara severed  diplomatic relations with Khartoum permitted the Sudanese opposition, the National Democratic Alliance to open an office in the former Sudanese embassy in Asmara.  Al Qaeda also sought to establish links with other African Islamist parties and armed groups especially in 1992- 96.  The plight of the Moslems of the Ogaden, an area situates South East of Ethiopia , with Kenya to the South,  Somalia to the East, and Djibouti to the North , came to the direct attention of Osama , shortly after he established himself in Khartoum in December 1991.  It is an exclusively Moslem area with a long established history of both hostility and conflicts with "outsiders".  It is an area where both Arabic and Somali languages are spoken.  Because and as a result that is a "lawless" region beyond the reach of government and governmental agencies Osama  was more than quick to establish a vital presence there.

 

 

Strategic Political Intelligence

Resolution Mediation Services

Polo Park Portage Avenue Super 8  Winnipeg Motel

Fire Your Supervisor

www.tratfor.com

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

Totalitarianism”  the intellectuals claim that it is all in the name of  “democracy”  and “democratization”.  The truth is somewhere in the range that the Soviet Communists have taken significant steps toward “liberalizing”  party and Soviet practices .  This evolution towards democracy continues to march onwards and upwards.  It has profoundly altered interests and practices , none withstanding.

Russia forces BP top executive to flee | Samizdata.net – Democratic (as in lawfull)? No. The government might have been secular in some sense but an Ayatollah was house speaker. The coup took place after the fall of the Iron Curtain on Eastern Europe, after the Berlin airlift, in the midst of the Cold ….. whatever the state of the Iranian government, British Intelligence fermented the coup for purely commercial reasons. Posted by Trooper Thompson at July 27, 2008 05:51 PM. dan,. If I am a useful idiot, you are a lazy pedant. …

RGE – The Worst Financial Crisis Since the Great Depression – The 10T took decades to ferment, the new loans have managed to do 10- 30% in mere months. We no longer have a Medicare/Medicaid, Social Security and pension debacle for politicians to fret over. Now we have a bona fide interloper and true showstopper. …… While people behind the Iron Curtain suffered permanent impoverishment, free markets and a free society went hand-in-hand in the West and material gains were available to anyone prepared to work hard. …

Hillary Is 44 » Blog Archive » The Rise Of The Obama Crimelords … – we need to pay less attention to the act on the stage and more attention to what goes on behind the curtain. djia Says: April 9th, 2009 at 9:52 am. Have a good day everyone….. gotta go to work now! will check in tonight …… conflicts because I remember working with this male RN 20 some years ago and he would work 6 months out of the year and travel to third world countries, including Afghanistan, share caves with the Mullahs, go behind the iron curtain the other 6… …

ACTION UKRAINE REPORT (Archive): AUR#900 Aug 25 Georgia and the … – Ever since the Russian invasion of democratic Georgia, pundits and politicians have been writing extensively about the “new Cold War” that is emerging between Russia and the West. … Sadly, there was no Churchillian figure who grand eloquently warned the West of an iron curtain descending on Europe, or perhaps, more aptly, an oil-fused one. While NATO was clearly formed to counter the Soviet military threat, at the most recent conference in Bucharest, NATO members bent …

ACTION UKRAINE REPORT (Archive): AUR#931 Mar 2 Ukraine: Coca-Cola … – The plant’s main activity is the production of the fermented drink ‘Kvas’, which is produced under the “Yarylo” brand. As stated by Mr. Hill, the CEO of Coca-Cola Beverage Ukraine, the company is going to develop the “Yarylo” brand further, …… Hungarian Prime Minister Ferenc Gyurcsany, who proposed a bailout package of up to euro190 billion ($240.84 billion), warned that without aid a “new Iron Curtain” would descend on Europe and again separate East from West. …

Collective leadership , first under Malenkov, then under Khrushchev repudiated greatly Stalin;s techniques of government by extreme terror.  Denouncing Stalin’s  “cult of personality” – meaning his refusal to to recognize any law higher than his own bloody caprice -  Khrushchev  in his now famous “Secret Speech” ushered in a new era.   Terror largely gave way to persuasion, arbitrary violence to government by law and rules.  With the extensive de-Stalinization proceedings at the Twenty-second Congress five years afterwards the Party surpassed all previous attempts to sponge away the taints of Stalin’s autocracy.

 

 

Winnipeg Used Toyota Camry

Winnipeg Used Volkswagen Passat

winnipeg used vw beetle

Winnipeg Car Dealers

Resolution Mediation Services

www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

Western governments had stressed a new military capacity , the need increased for an expansion of military expenditures and the legitimacy of the use of military force in international conflicts and international geopolitical relations. Kimmy Carter pledged himself in 1978 to a 3 .3 % in military spending , the Republican Party manifesto committed itself to restoring military superiority. Speaking to cadres at its miltary academy at West Point in 1981 on the dangers of "Treaty Trap" President Ronald Reagan promised to expand America’s military strength. "No nation that placed its faith in parchment or paper while at the same time it gave up its protective hardware (military) ever lasted long enough to write many pages in history" he said. Reagan’s first Secretary of State Alexander Haig stated on many occasions during the first months after coming into office that the Administration’s priority was , in his phase , " the restoration of U.S. military and economic strength" He told an audience that "some things were more valuable than peace" Tratfor www.fortunawebs.com www.fortunacooks.com www.fishlakemanitobanarrows.com

 

Limo Rental Limousine Service Chicago

Inexpensive Engagement Rings

k Peace in Our Time

 

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

 

Islamic and their backers have a shallow and uncivilized “ideology” which cannot stand up to any rational thinking. It does not offer any alternative to any social, political, or economic order which mankind has thus far has known. It exclusively incites to hatred, violence, and discrimination against women and followers of other faiths. It is even an over statement to say it is bankrupt. Bankruptcy usually applies to someone who has possessed something and then lost it. Islamic, including numerous passages in Shari’a and the Koran, is a destructive mindset. It is a sociology-political virus.

However, without oil and suicide bombing Islamic would be roaming the Arabian Peninsula, the birth place of Islamic, and perish from hunger. Petrodollars and Wahabism, a wild irrational version of Islam, are nurturing Islamism and Muslim terror. Koran schools across the globe stuff young brains with hatred against the rest of the world. Students at these schools are taught that they are the “real Muslims”. Ridding the world of the “infidels” is their primary religious obligation. In return for blowing up themselves in crowded places they are promised paradise and an eternal prosperous life among 72 young virgin pretty women of their choice.

Now, when you scrutinize Islamic on the ground, you find out that its backers, in particular in the Arab world, focus on the following:

For Islamic, women are the source of all evil. They (men) primarily associate women with sex and only sex. Therefore, women must cover every part of their body when they are outside their homes. Women are seductive, Islamists allege. If they expose any part of their body, men would be distracted and their lust is stirred, which is eventually “sinful”. An Islamist told me that when he is in Europe he sees so much flesh and hence his lust dwindles. At home in Saudi Arabia, he has much more sexual lust. He figures out all kinds of beauty under women’s clothes in the street. He rushes home to pour his lust in his wife. And that is more exciting.

- According to Islamists, women must be ready for intercourse at any time the husband wishes so.

“Your wives are a filth for you, so go into your filth when you like, and do good beforehand for yourselves, and be careful (of your duty) to Allah, and know that you will meet Him, and give good news to the believers.” (Sura 2, verse 223).

During menstruation, however, men should keep away from women; they are filthy. The Koran says:

“It (menstruation) is a discomfort; therefore keep aloof from the women during the menstrual discharge and do not go near them until they have become clean; then when they have cleansed themselves, go in to them as Allah has commanded you; surely Allah loves those who turn much (to Him), and He loves those who purify themselves.” (Sura 2, verse 222).

Women, according to Islamists and the Koran, are, in general, unclean creature. After a Muslim has washed and prepared himself for prayer, he should not touch a woman. She tarnishes his cleanliness. Therefore, “pious” Muslims never shake hands with women.

“O you who believe! do not go near prayer until you have washed yourselves; and if you have touched women, and you cannot find water, betake yourselves to pure earth, then wipe your faces and your hands; surely Allah is Pardoning, Forgiving.” (Sura 4, verse 43).

For Islamists, even the woman’s voice is “’aura” (a sexual organ). A woman on Saudi radio and TV, for instance, is not allowed to be interviewed by a man. Also a woman should never tell her name in public. Therefore, she is, for example, “um Muhammad”, (the mother of Muhammad), or “um Ali”.

In a public place an Islamist walks a couple of feet ahead of his wife or close female relatives, covered from head to toe. He wants to signal to passers-by, these are my women, do not look at them. They are mine. Thus women are not only sex objects, they are also a piece of property.

Islamists demand that a woman’s face should never be photographed. Women of Islamists in Kuwait are allowed to have their photos on the driver’s license with a dark black face cover. The majority of them are usually reckless drivers and no police dare stop them to take them to task.

Islamists in several Arab and Muslim countries have succeeded in forcing sex-segregation at schools and universities. That is the case in Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, UAE, Qatar, Malaysia, Iran, and Pakistan. Bosnia and Kosovo are also introducing this system.

Women as witnesses, according to Islamists, are unreliable. Therefore, the testimony of two female witnesses are required to equal that of one male witness in Shari’a courts (Sura 2, verse 282). Further, Women are entitled to inherit only half a portion of that of a man (Sura 4, verse 176). For many men at the Arab Gulf, the brain of a woman is “too small”; it is half the size of that of a man.

Also, Islamists encourage forcing minor girls to marry. The youngest was 8 years old whose father forced her to marry a 57-year-man in Sana’a, the Yemen Times reports (October 10, 2008). As some human rights organizations protested, a local judge defended the case by analogy; the Prophet Muhammad married Aisha, one of his wives, as she was 9 years old.

Men and women, in most Arab oil rich countries, are not allowed to hug or kiss each other in public, at the airport, for instance, when they welcome relatives and friends back from a journey or say farewell to them. For weeks now, Islamists in Kuwait have been condemning a 14-year-old girl who kissed a singer in a family wedding party in a hotel in Kuwait city. Some of them called the girl a “whore” and demanded punishing her and her parents.

Another triviality of Islamists is the ad nausea repetition of “peace and prayers be upon him” every time the name of the Prophet Muhammad is mentioned. It is a must. Otherwise, you are not “pious” enough”.

A real Muslim, for Islamic, is the one who practices Islam to the letter. Muslims are not allowed to use their left hand when they eat or drink. It is the one which one uses to wash their ass.

According to Islamists, a Muslim should never donate an organ, heart or kidneys for example, to a non-Muslim. Ali Gumaa, the grand mufti of Egypt and the Islamist fanatic, Yousef Al Qaradhawi, approved of that on Al Jazeera TV (February 16, 2008).

Freedom of speech is also forbidden, according to Islamists. You are not allowed to question anything in the Koran, Hadeeth, or Shari’a. These scripts are sacred.

Books that criticize certain Islamic practices are also forbidden. The “evolution theory” is also banned from all schools in the earlier mentioned countries. Even the “One Thousand and one Nights” is forbidden in many Arab countries. Some Islamists preach, the Koran is the only book that is worth of reading. It has got everything you need to know. This is reminiscent of what the second Caliph, Omar Ibn Al Khattab did with the Library of Alexandria in the 7th century, the greatest and most precious at the time. Before burning the Library down, he said, “If it contains books which preach what Islam advocates, then it is superfluous. If it doesn’t, then it should be destroyed.” And it was.

Music, for Islamists, is also haram (forbidden). It is a Western fad. It is noise. A good Muslim listens only to recorded recitations of the Koran.

Political “parties” is “hizb” (fragmentation) and as such are forbidden in the Arab Gulf countries. In Kuwait there is a parliament, but parties are forbidden. Saudi Arabia rejects democracy all together. It is un-Islamic. Shura (consultation) is the Islamic alternative. This is one of the reasons why the Al Saud are vehemently sticking to Shari’a. It justifies their absolute despotic rule.

Besides, Islamists reject all secular constitutions and secular laws. They advocate that the Shari’a is the best constitution on earth. It is the law of Allah.

Islamists also reject religious pluralism. Any other faith than Islam is fake. The Saudis and the Turks, both led by Islamists, enjoy religious pluralism in the West. But in their own countries, no churches, synagogues, or temples are allowed to be built.

In addition, until now, no-Muslims are not allowed to enter Mecca and Medina in Saudi Arabia. They are “holy places” and only Muslims are allowed to visit them.

Islam is the only religion in the world that declares Muslims who convert to other faiths apostates and sentences them to death. Islamists enforce this with death fatwas. This is a gross violation of a basic human right which the UN Charter prescribes and all Arab and Muslim countries ratified.

For Islamists, people who satirize Islamic symbols are declared satanic/heretic and deserve the death penalty. The Muhammad-Cartoons are a case in point.

Every time a hurricane hits the USA, the Islamic rejoice. They propagate, that is the curse of Allah on the “infidels”. As the tsunami hit South East Asia, Nabeel Al Awadhi claimed in an article for the Kuwaiti Al Watan daily (April 2006), “The tsunami hit more infidels than Muslims.” In’ the same paper, Waleed Al Tabtaba’i concluded (October 5, 2008) that the recent international financial crisis is Allah’ chastisement for the people who deal with riba (usury).” Rajab Al Banna, a columnist with the Egyptian daily, Al Ahram, alleges (May 26, 2007), “Western charity organizations are not interested in humanitarian aid. Their ultimate aim is proselytizing Muslims and help them convert to Christianity.”

As you can see, the Islamists find always a “rational” explanation to events in the world.

The Islamist dogma is void and anti-human. But thanks to petrodollars, lack of genuine democracy and freedom of speech in the Arab and Muslim world – which for decades has been ignored by the West for geopolitical and economic interests – and thanks to relativists in their cozy offices, Islamism is thriving and Islamists are emboldened.

School textbooks in Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, and Indonesia, for example, are still teaching hatred and violence against people of other faiths. According to the latest UN Education Report (2007), these books are funded by Saudi Arabia. And no body dare touch on that. Governments and individuals are intimidated. It is allegedly an internal matter, and justified as freedom of belief. This is perverse. Violating basic human rights has nothing to do with freedom of belief.

The USA and the European Union know all that, yet they have not undertaken concrete measure to ban these toxic textbooks. There must the war on terror begin. Islamists are illiterate in terms of common sense and human civilized coexistence. They are outlaws who need to be re-educated and integrated in our civilized world.

It is very important to distinguish between ordinary Muslims and Islamists. The majority of Muslims around the globe are peaceful people, more or less religious like all followers of other faiths whether they are Christians, Jews, Hindus, or Buddhists. Every human being must have the right to believe in whatever they deem appropriate, including Islamists. But nobody has the right to IMPOSE his beliefs on other, oppress them, discriminate against them, and terrorize them, as Islamists are doing every day.

The so-called Mutawa’s, religious police in Saudi Arabia, are empowered to force all women to cover their bodies from head to toe, even 5-year-old girls. Pedestrians during prayer times are forced to go the mosque and pray, sometimes even non-Muslims are forced to do so. Women who travel by taxi alone are accused of adultery. Both the woman and the taxi driver are imprisoned and tortured. In Gaza, Basra/Iraq, south Lebanon, and Iran no woman is allowed to walk in a public place without a hijab (headscarf). In most Egyptian towns, women without a headscarf are denigrated and treated as prostitutes.

More and more governments in the Middle East, for example, in Egypt, Syria, Kuwait, Pakistan, Morocco, Algeria, Yemen, and Iraq are allying themselves with Islamists in a bid to appease the latter. Demonizing the West would partially appease the Islamists and essentially debilitate the demand for democracy in these countries.

The problem is not Islam; it has existed for 1400 years and will still, realistically speaking, exist. The problem in the 21st century is the Islamists. They have hijacked both Islam and moderate Muslims. The resources of these thugs must be dried out and this is the responsibility of all of us. We must not be intimidated by them under any circumstances. They are a socio-cultural virus that must be eradicated by all means.

Finally, a colleague told me, Islam is sick. And its disease is called Islamism. The world community must fight this devastating disease, this Black Death. It is disrupting peace and stability in the whole world. Abdul Hadi Palazzi, an Italian Islam expert said several times, “The Americans should have invaded Saudi Arabia, instead of Iraq. It IS the source of all evil.” I would add Egypt, Qatar, and the UAE. The Islamist establishments in these countries and their media are fostering Islamism. All these regimes proclaim that they are friends of the West, but at the same time they fund and support Islamism. It is, however, clear that America and the West at large would not want to antagonize these regimes for well-known geopolitical and economic considerations.

 

     Blog Bid Directory                                                                                                                                     

  Intelligent Analysis

Resolution Mediation Services

                                                                                                                                            www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

 

Mark Levin’s "Liberty and Tyranny: A Conservative Manifesto" couldn’t be more relevant or important. It is a masterful restatement of conservative principles that is succinct (205 pages) and yet comprehensive. It is thoughtful and deep but highly readable. It is timely yet timeless.


Conservatism is under attack from puffed-up liberals, feeling their oats with the ascendancy of President Barack Obama and the huge Democratic congressional majorities, and from a disgruntled group of conservatives who believe that conservatism, to remain politically effective, needs a face-lift.


Liberal columnists are writing with unrestrained glee about conservatism’s internecine wars, and conservatives are engaged in intramural debates about which principles and policies conservatives should be promoting. Levin’s book will go a long way toward muting the liberals’ premature gloating and refuting the arguments of those who, perhaps with good intentions, would hijack conservatism from within and transform it into liberalism lite, all in the name of political pragmatism. "An ‘effective’ government that operates outside its constitutional limitations is a dangerous government," Levin writes. "By abandoning principle for efficiency, the neo-Statist, it seems, is no more bound to the Constitution than the Statist. He marches more slowly ? but he marches with him nonetheless."

  BUY THE BOOK …
 

51ZNDm8TuRL. SL160 AA115  Mark Levins ‘Liberty and Tyranny’


at a discount
by clicking HERE.

 

There has not been a widely read conservative manifesto as such since Barry Goldwater’s "The Conscience of a Conservative" in 1960. Given the unbridled assault on conservatism today, not to mention the personal attacks on its leading proponents, we must celebrate the release of "Liberty and Tyranny" as the modern road map back to our conservative roots.


Having eaten, breathed, slept and studied conservatism, politics, law and history his entire life, Levin, who is my friend and client, is uniquely qualified and situated to have written this book. In undertaking this formidable task, he stands on the shoulders of the giants who have preceded him but has made those giants very proud with this work.


Don’t make the mistake — no matter how learned you are in politics or related disciplines — of assuming you have nothing to gain from reading a primer on conservative thought. This is much more than a primer. It delves into the historical and philosophical roots of conservative thought and ties them to America’s founding. It explains the enduring principles that undergird our unique constitutional system and exposes the dangers in continuing to violate those principles.


Levin identifies conservatism’s relentless nemesis, the statist, who seeks to grow the state at the expense of the individual and his liberty. The statist’s goals are clear, but his methods are deceitful: promising equality, security and Utopia but delivering tyranny. In the current administration, we are witnessing the rise of the statist to new heights. And he must be stopped if we are to preserve our freedom, prosperity and moral order.


When you read this book, you will learn or be reminded not only that private property and liberty are inseparable but also why. You will learn that a conservative is not only a free market libertarian but also one who believes in a civil society with an underlying moral order in which "the individual is recognized and accepted as more than an abstract statistic or faceless member of some group; rather he is a unique, spiritual being with a soul and a conscience." You will be disabused of the myth that conservatives are fixed in some time warp that requires them to oppose all change. Rather, they believe in change as reform, undertaken with prudence — "informed by the experience, knowledge, and traditions of society, tailored for a specific purpose, and accomplished through a constitutional construct that ensures thoughtful deliberation by the community. Change unconstrained by prudence produces unpredictable consequences, threatening ordered liberty with chaos and ultimately despotism, and placing at risk the very principles the Conservative holds dear."


You will learn the meaning and significance of our Founders’ belief in unalienable rights and that they are unalienable precisely because they come from G-d. Conservatism is otherwise unintelligible. "An individual may benefit from the moral order and unalienable rights around which society functions while rejecting their Divine Origin. But the civil society cannot organize itself that way."


You will learn why interpreting the Constitution in light of its original understanding is essential to preserving our ordered liberty and how we’ve departed from those principles, as with the erosion of the doctrines of federalism and states’ rights and the destructive consequences that have followed.


Levin also unpacks for us the complex issue of immigration, the ravages of the welfare state, the liberty-threatening practices of the radical environmentalists, and the indispensability of safeguarding America’s sovereignty and national security.


As the Obama administration has unleashed its extremist statist agenda, it seems providential that this book is just now being released. If this nation is to beat back the current administration’s rush toward enslaving-and-impoverishing socialism, it must reclaim its founding principles, as brilliantly expounded in this book.

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/david/limbaugh032009.php3?printer_friendly

 

 

Winnipeg Hotel Virtual Tours of the Quality Inn Hotel Winnipeg

Winnipeg South Budget Hotel

Winnipeg Hotel Amenities at the Quality Inn Winnipeg Hotel

Tratfor Intelligence

www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments

 

When Hitler set out to conquer the world, it was American blood, treasure and determination that stopped him. When the Soviet Union set out to subject the world to communism, it was American blood, treasure and determination that stopped it. If the Muslim extremists’ quest to subject the world to radical Islam is to be stopped, it will, once again, take American blood, treasure and determination. It may be true that the Islamic extremists who call for world domination represent only a minority of the world’s Muslims. Minority or not, it is they who drive the Muslim agenda and unashamedly slaughter untold thousands of people in the name of their Allah. They claim their authority comes from the Qumran – the same Qumran, and the same Allah, the rest of the Muslim world worships. Consequently, all Muslims must bear the responsibility for the inhumane actions of the extremist minority. If the extremists are such a minority of the Muslim population, why does the majority not put a stop to the extremists? There can be only two possible answers: either the majority is in agreement with the goals, if not the tactics, of the extremists, or the majority is incapable of controlling the minority. Both answers are probably correct. When a cartoonist published a caricature of Allah, Muslims around the world filled the streets in protest. Were they all extremists, or just in agreement with the goals of the extremists? By contrast, the image of Christ is desecrated regularly, and the public response is "ho-hum."

 

                                                                                                                                                                                   Tratfor Strategic Intelligence

Resolution Mediation Services

                     www.tratfor.com

Blog Traffic Exchange Related Websites

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

0 comments   Comments